Just two big question marks, will the courts allow such a major variation from TPL's established method of evaluating damage (by forcing the purchase of  the MMP package).

Please explain where the variation lies in TPL's established method, which has consistently stated that licensing fees would increase as discounted licenses were taken up.

Just in case you missed it before,

"the presumption against retroactive legislation is deeply rooted in our jurisprudence, and embodies a legal doctrine centuries older than our Republic."

Be well