From Alton regarding Roger Cook's performance:

However, I believe an attorney's real value is less in the oral arguments and more important in what I call the "paper work", briefs, negotiations, and whatever they else they do.

Perhaps, we are too mindful of the TV dramas like Matlock, Perry Mason, and for you old timers the Defenders (E. G. Marshall) where they always had a gotcha moment. Understandable since a TV show with lawyers doing paper work would not make it. Though it would be a lot better than what is on TV now. Going way OT now so I shall go back to lurking.

and from me, just read some of the things Roger has written and look at

how many cases he's won. The guy is very very intelligent. AND:

We're looking pretty solid so far on the bread and butter patents too:

336 & 148. Markman, 45+ License agreements.

I too have NO idea of what they were talking about. I was trying to

put the pieces together and that's what it sounded like the Justices were

trying to do too. They didn't understand the technology any better

than many here and less than ethan hawk, opty, ease and others.

Remember Dan L. called this a "Highly Technical Term"

Anyway, it is what it is.

Let's see how it fairs in the USPTO. Maybe it's a goner, maybe not.

Hopefully the 336 and the 148 make it through just as strong as they've

been for the past 2+years since the Markman ruling.

And yes, we've got LG vs. Quantas coming up...........but that still isn't

as important as the USPTO right now.

Which brings me to another thought:

Did the J's as Ehwest has said, purchase their chips from INTEL? Meaning

that a win by Quantas would have been a win for the J3?

Just curious to know if this is true. It might shed some light on some things

"if" this is true.

Thanks in advance for your iinput.

d