thanks for the well written response. i have never followed the lead from any poster on this forum. can u say the same? i have looked into his background and he has no experience as a ceo. he has advisory board experience and that is not the same. i do not believe JT offered PTSC much and his testimony was not based on practical technical experience but one of a writers opinion on technology. i have read a lot of JT's articles and have found most to be the rather vague musings of a man that has general knowledge but not a working knowledge. it is my opinion and if it is one that has become a "song and dance are growing old and becoming wearisome"...then ignore it. i have held true to my opinion of the BOD since the dividends were issued and their was nothing left in the treasury. yet u have supported these folks at every opportunity....your money...your choice....but i do not criticize or confront u for that opinion. i state my opinion...you attack every poster that does not paint this company in a positive light........and yet it should be obvious to you (maybe not) that the BOD has not looked after our best interests and JT did not turn out to be a suitable candidate to lead PTSC forward. the warrant removal happened while JT was the current seat warmer and not because of him (IMO).

this will be my last response to u manor. you are one of the most disruptive, anti debate voices on this board. have some tea and cookies and i wont even tell u what to do with your "thumb"....i will leave that up to u.

teremoto