Where did this come from?

"Well, it would be interesting to me to know whether SGE1 believes that Matsushita doesn't know the terms of the MOU, but that Toshiba does, or vice-versa."

All I can think is that you didn't understand/grasp the concept regarding segregated subsections of the MOU (attachments), each pertinent to a specific "player". If such a thing were in play, why would you think that Matsushita would be permitted to see what Toshiba settled for?

But there is little point to further discusion.....

BTW, I have coordinated with the company and they confirmed that they are, indeed, fully cognizant of the full terms of the MOU with the Js, as well as the licensing agreements with licensees of February. The contingency theory is officially dead IMO.

My sincere apologies to all who may have been influenced by my delusions.

SGE