Apparently the 336 is recertified, and going only on what has been evidenced by the amount of time a new reexam request takes to conclusion we could go the length of the whole trial procedure with the 336 being valid as stands. The last reexam request took 2 years 4 months to complete. It does not seem that the Judge wants to delay proceedings that long, since he only allowed a stay of 90 days. It is quite obvious that the tactics are now to have reexam after reexam and motion after motion regarding them. The whole industry is playing tag team on us with these tactics. They seem to me to be trying to usurp the reexam appeal process with these constant reexam request. Perhaps the KSR ruling has allowed this to happen since the wording in the recent reexam request seem to imply combinations of different prior art? JMO