Re: ease2002
in response to
by
posted on
Oct 13, 2009 09:34PM
Why should Swartz's lawyer stay on the BOD?
As I already stated:
Turning now to Johnson, most with a large investment in a company would seek board representation. If S&L's is now such that it is minimal, that reason no longer exists. Which begs the question why replace one lawyer with another?
.
.
Be well