No problem with me that they are compliant. You are changing the subject, however, as we were discussing reasons Ms Felcyn is needed.

Felcyn is the reason for the compliance that you have no problem with.

http://patriotscientific.com/pdf/AC-Charter-10-28-09.pdf

In your eagerness to focus on compliance, I believe you overlooked my question, for which I would appreciate your reply:

Of the three things that you know, what is Johnson's "core interest" regarding TPL?

Unless you like your herrings red, please bear in mind that the fishing expedition you plan to undertake regarding pay was fully disclosed in an SEC filing.

Think about it.

.

.

.

Be well