I guess I'm caught, as I am not doing as I said (last post on this topic). But I just couldn't let this slide.
Do you read what's said here?
You say "There was no honest dialogue. No compromise. No, "We will keep it in mind for future letters."
Might I remind you:
Re: SGE/Ease/ccraider...... a suggestion.....Ron
First, I am sorry to hear of family medical issues, and sincerely hope they are positively resolved ASAP.
I appreciate your words of caution as to language used in these communications with the PTO. I seriously doubt that any such language will be used again.
Those words were carefully considered, and the input of an attorney was solicited regarding this language.
et al - honest dialogue.
No honest dialogue? No "compromise"? No, "We will keep it in mind for future letters."?
Is this another interpretation problem? Must we consult our dictionaries? What planet are you on? It seems the only problem here is YOU.
SGE
