Something just doesn't seem right. All we can obtain from the opponents SJ request is a denial of the motion. And to avoid losing the 336 patent we need to put our cards on the table prior to the Markman.

If nothing to lose with potential to gain much, one would think that a SJ request prior to the Markman is what everyone would do all the time. So what about the other patents? Why not make similar requests on those as well? We provided necessary evidence on those, just not the 336? Or is it that what was sufficient for those other patent are not sufficient for the 336?

And is this SJ only with respect to Barco's accused products, or does it pertain to Acer and HTC as well?

Ron, you seem to be on a tare. Now that we have you warmed up, if you have any thoughts on the above, most appreciated.

Opty