ads123

I think the following from Al-Stayedin (May 1, at 12.11PM) is what your are referring to:

I (Al_Stayedin) have been a shareholder since 1994, this is the second time I attended the SHM.

Although I spoke with Cliff Flowers a few months ago, and meeting him yesterday confirmed that he is a conservative individual, who measures his words, as well as his actions. IMHO he is great for the task he has a head of him.

Speaking with Gloria, PTSC has great plans for the future but of course there is only so much she can say and stay within the law.

Did not get a chance to meet with Carl Johnson, seem like a nice person.

I had a chance to speak with Dan Leckrone, you can tell that he "commands authority" and carries a "big stick".

I had a question concerning the future of the MMP after the life of the patent ends and much to my dismay he was brutally honest, “assuming we win not much”, he implied WIN is going to be huge, but that there would be other major opportunities for PTSC continuance into the future.

Me.... being an optimist, was kind of dismayed, while many here on many times warned of the same outcome that Dan L. stated, I had always hoped that there would be some way to revive the patents, extend the life of the patents and that is clearly not going to happen after speaking with Dan and Cliff.

However Dan mentioned that there are BIG things coming our way, more opportunities for shareholder value that are in the works that will cause PTSC to continue prospering into the future, while this may give

Dan gave me the impression that he is completely at ease with the PTSC TPL relationship, there seems to be a strong unity between both, imho like mindedness is good for all companies, that there be no division, or strife.

My speculation: Possible Merger in the future? Possible acquisition of more patent portfolios? Continuous of enforcing bullet proof patents? Divies to come?

But for long term sustainability, we need a solid long term Business Plan otherwise many will bail out and never return.

I know many may hate this since it did not work well in the past: More acquisitions of companies? An old saying: If at first you do not succeed, try…try again. The idea is a good one but I think the BOD has learned many costly lessons that they will not repeat again.

Who knows for sure, but after the expected win, I think that the PTSC BOD needs to present a 5 Year business plan outlining how they will increase shareholder value, how the company is expected to grow after the patents expire.

I suppose with Billions in the Bank (I hope) they will be able then do what they could not do before being tied up in litigation.

IMHO with the Proper Court Wins: With the news media informing the world how a tiny company was able to defeat the World’s Best Patent Defense Attorney firms and win big, how a tiny company was kept from success due to patent theft as well as suppressed due to the constant patent reexamination requests made by the infringers, is going to make a BIG Well Known Name for PTSC worldwide and for a business Brand Name Recognition is a must, I trust we will have that.

My Hopes: That the world’s investors want to buy in creating an upsurge in demand for the stock and the stock can only go up, that is if all goes well with the News Media.