HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: OT: Monday morning thoughts- SPQ Thx guys/JD
4
Oct 21, 2007 06:45PM
3
Oct 21, 2007 06:55PM
1
Oct 21, 2007 07:00PM
21
Oct 21, 2007 09:29PM
14
Oct 22, 2007 02:29AM
3
Oct 22, 2007 03:20AM
5
Oct 22, 2007 04:38AM
3
Oct 22, 2007 05:28AM
2
Oct 22, 2007 06:51AM
5
Oct 22, 2007 07:28AM
6
Oct 22, 2007 07:46AM

Oct 22, 2007 08:04AM
11
Oct 22, 2007 08:10AM
I totally understand your perspective and I have no problem with you countering an attack. For me it's the way that it is done that is the problem. I think you best undermine their attacks when your response is neutral. They have nothing on you when you respond with the truth, as you know it, offered up in a factual way. I know that it's natural for all of us to get hot under the collar now and again, but I'll tell you that my esteem for any poster is challenged when they can't keep their cool. How can we trust an individuals advice when it's value is possibly undermined by their emotions? You need to trust peoples ability to recognize sound reasoning and delivery of information. Those that don't possess this ability, you are not responsible for as they don't belong in this game. Again, I look forward to all of your posts.
2
Oct 23, 2007 05:04AM
1
Oct 23, 2007 05:18AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply