HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Rail Cost Estimate tonnage
10
Nov 15, 2008 09:52AM
12
Nov 15, 2008 02:13PM
12
Nov 16, 2008 10:27AM
11
Nov 16, 2008 11:32AM

tau
Nov 16, 2008 12:12PM
5
Nov 16, 2008 03:43PM
6
Nov 16, 2008 04:02PM
1
tau
Nov 16, 2008 04:20PM
6
Nov 16, 2008 04:24PM

Nov 16, 2008 04:27PM
2
tau
Nov 17, 2008 05:11PM

So, with these figures, They would build the rail line, supply 100 cars of rolling stock, plus the power to move it, in order to move 30-40 trains a year out of there. What they could charge per tonne of ore would not even justify the cost of the rolling stock and locomotives, let alone somehow amortize the cost of construction.

In order to justify a rail line they will have to prove up reserves to provide minimum of three trains a week (10,000 tonnes each), for a minimum of 20 years. Anything less, and it will only be done by truck, over a road that is subsidized by the Ontario Gov't.

Regards

K

3
Nov 17, 2008 06:13PM
3
Nov 17, 2008 06:17PM
1
Nov 18, 2008 04:47AM
10
Nov 18, 2008 04:54AM
4
CMP
Nov 18, 2008 05:50AM
2
tau
Nov 18, 2008 06:16AM
5
Nov 18, 2008 06:45AM
5
Nov 18, 2008 06:50AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply