There's only one explination that makes sense to me as to why this has been done. We have been sold. A price has been agreed to in principle. There is no need for a new CEO to make the decision to continue the Agoracom relationship because there is no need for a new CEO. If this is the case, I don't see the sales price being any higher than $3/share in the current economic environment.

For the record, I am not happy about the Agoracom decision, nor would I be happy with $3/share. The company is worth so much more with addtional drilling and in the right economic environment.

I am just trying to find the most simple and rational explination for this irrational decision. The simplest explination is usually correct.

Thoughts?