HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Cr vs Ni and Cliffs/ Don
24
Apr 28, 2009 03:50PM
4
Apr 28, 2009 04:20PM
9
Apr 28, 2009 04:39PM
5
Apr 28, 2009 04:40PM
4
Apr 28, 2009 05:56PM
3
Apr 28, 2009 06:17PM
5
Apr 28, 2009 06:56PM

"I would suggest you go back and listen to the audio presentation ( quicktunes download the audio for those looking for a server) The conversation about Cliffs

had to do with The feasabily of a market for chrome,As per Pauls statements

He felt that the market for chrome was Europeand Asia and Cliffs was more

focussed on the North American markert."



Which, I would submit, would result in the same bottom line, that Cliffs would not likely be a target company to involve in the future as NOT would have their own ideas about who would be desireable players/directions for them. Although I underlined the competitive tone, it was not intended to be a negative comment, as I likewise feel the presentation was about forward movement.

9
Apr 29, 2009 03:16AM
4
Apr 29, 2009 03:30AM
4
Apr 29, 2009 05:11AM
4
Apr 29, 2009 05:47AM
5
mgb
Apr 29, 2009 07:37AM
6
Apr 29, 2009 08:59AM
2
Apr 29, 2009 12:08PM
3
Apr 29, 2009 12:22PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply