HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Cr vs Ni
24
Apr 28, 2009 03:50PM
4
Apr 28, 2009 04:20PM
9
Apr 28, 2009 04:39PM
5
Apr 28, 2009 04:40PM
4
Apr 28, 2009 05:56PM
3
Apr 28, 2009 06:17PM
5
Apr 28, 2009 06:56PM
3
Apr 29, 2009 02:08AM

Re: Cr vs Ni

in response to by
posted on Apr 29, 2009 03:16AM

A rule in doing business is that you do not 'knock your competition' people take such action as 'mean spirited' and don't believe you anyway since you aren't exactly neutral.

Saying that Cliffs taking a position in a ROF player doesn't 'mean anything' is just plain wrong. It might not be as important as some think but it certainly is causing a lot of investors to take a second look at Chromite.

Noront is, imho, showing a lack of judgement starting a 'pissing contest'. Remember if you start throwing mud it've very likely you will get splattered.

4
Apr 29, 2009 03:30AM
4
Apr 29, 2009 05:11AM
4
Apr 29, 2009 05:47AM
5
mgb
Apr 29, 2009 07:37AM
6
Apr 29, 2009 08:59AM
2
Apr 29, 2009 12:08PM
3
Apr 29, 2009 12:22PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply