HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: No Smelter at Thunder Bay?
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
No Smelter at Thunder Bay?
33
Zooloo
Nov 30, 2009 10:50AM
Re: No Smelter at Thunder Bay?
4
Edgy
Nov 30, 2009 11:02AM
Re: No Smelter at Thunder Bay?

Orange Flash
Nov 30, 2009 11:10AM
Re: No Smelter at Thunder Bay?
6
Justduke
Nov 30, 2009 11:40AM
Re: No Smelter at Thunder Bay?
4
Zooloo
Nov 30, 2009 11:41AM
Re: No Smelter at Thunder Bay?
4
Edgy
Nov 30, 2009 11:46AM
Re: No Smelter at Thunder Bay?
4
puppin
Nov 30, 2009 12:08PM
Re: No Smelter at Thunder Bay?
3
Chauncey Gardiner
Nov 30, 2009 12:12PM
Re: No Smelter at Thunder Bay?
4
oiramoric
Nov 30, 2009 12:17PM
Re: No Smelter at Thunder Bay?
3
Deke
Nov 30, 2009 02:11PM

That's for certain that McGuinty is no Danny Williams! But the point is, there is talk that the smelter will be in the U.S.A. If this firms up, some group (NOT shareholders?) needs to organize an outcry to get it in Ontario where it belongs. Undoubtedly, Ontario has strong levers at its disposal without (heaven forbid!) injecting taxpayers' funds.

Best, O.F.

4 Recommendations
Re: No Smelter at Thunder Bay?
3
crazytrade
Nov 30, 2009 02:23PM
Re: No Smelter at Thunder Bay?

Orange Flash
Nov 30, 2009 02:39PM
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply