HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Logistics Ban, no action?
7
Feb 17, 2010 05:12PM
1
Feb 17, 2010 05:15PM
6
Feb 17, 2010 05:35PM
5
Feb 17, 2010 05:39PM
5
Feb 18, 2010 09:05AM

Well Don. I appreciate your view. Now I have to look back at it and note some key words that you used.... not to say that what you've put down isn't plausible:

"... was brought to my attention" by whom?

"It appears..." is that like: maybe, I think/believe, suspect (not grounded in facts just impressions)

"my opinion" that speaks for itself

"50% (rumour)" ah yes rumour.

I wouldn't want to think what the mining companies would do in the face of that last rumour. It was my understanding that the FN wanted to be reasonable and benefit. You can't benefit from the land being mothballed and the co's waiting until the FNs come to their senses. At this point in the economy I wouldn't want to try and push a company that knows that they've got time on their side. CLF doesn't have to start asap. They could sit for a very long time... and if they do guess what happens..... also to the shares that the FN are also holding.

28
Feb 18, 2010 09:42AM
17
Feb 18, 2010 09:53AM
12
Feb 18, 2010 10:26AM
53
Feb 18, 2010 10:30AM
9
Feb 18, 2010 10:31AM
7
Feb 18, 2010 10:50AM
10
Feb 18, 2010 11:08AM
4
Feb 18, 2010 11:09AM
13
Feb 18, 2010 11:19AM

Feb 18, 2010 11:19AM
7
Feb 18, 2010 12:28PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply