HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Anyone get a reply..anyone care to turn the grey cells on and....
3
Jul 24, 2010 09:47AM
2
Jul 24, 2010 10:16AM
5
Jul 24, 2010 10:19AM
3
Jul 24, 2010 11:42AM
5
Jul 24, 2010 12:00PM
27
Jul 24, 2010 12:21PM
9
Jul 24, 2010 12:59PM
3
Jul 24, 2010 01:18PM
4
Jul 24, 2010 01:53PM
2
Jul 24, 2010 02:00PM

Jul 24, 2010 05:35PM
1
Jul 24, 2010 05:49PM
2
Jul 24, 2010 06:33PM

figure out what this means:

"Once in service they realized that since the material being drilled is so much denser ( and heavier) at these greater depths, the drills do not have the capacity to lift it out of the hole. This then creates a second problem as the lab they are using has everything calibrated to process material of much less density"

Now what do you think denser rock could mean? What happens to the relative weight of mineralized rock when the concentration increases significantly? How terrible would it be to find out that we've hit such a dense find that we have to adjust, retool, recalibrate to accommodate something that will bring great returns with a little added time? Certainly it is possible that the rock is simply denser due to the increased pressure, but that may not be the sole reason.

2
Jul 24, 2010 06:54PM
28
Jul 24, 2010 10:52PM
1
Jul 25, 2010 01:35AM
19
Jul 25, 2010 07:20AM
2
Jul 25, 2010 08:21AM
20
Jul 25, 2010 10:48AM
11
Jul 25, 2010 12:01PM
4
Jul 25, 2010 12:02PM
17
Jul 25, 2010 12:53PM
7
Jul 25, 2010 01:12PM
2
Jul 25, 2010 01:25PM
7
Jul 25, 2010 03:50PM
22
Jul 25, 2010 06:35PM
5
Jul 25, 2010 10:19PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply