HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: does history repeat itself ?...Sudbury history
14
Nov 15, 2013 05:48PM
12
Nov 15, 2013 06:04PM
3
Nov 15, 2013 09:26PM
9
Nov 16, 2013 12:46PM
13
Nov 16, 2013 12:53PM
3
Nov 16, 2013 01:01PM
7
Nov 16, 2013 03:28PM
1
lol
Nov 16, 2013 06:41PM

Being a Sudbury boy, I grew up with this lore, so let's see if I can get it right but may stand corrected. The Sudbury mining camp was discovered in 1886 when the Canadian Pacific railway, on its way west, was blasting a rusty rock outcrop just northwest of the current city of Sudbury. When the cut was blasted, the stuff inside was shiney and one of the construction crew, Thomas Frood (aka Frood mine still operating today) knew what it was and staked the ground. Shortly thereafter, a government surveyor, Mr Murray (of Murray mine fame) was running a survey line north from from the Whitefish Lake trading post, no doubt with a mandate of opening up land along the railroad route, when he walked right over top of the Creighton mine. His compass went wacko and in his report he attributed this to the likely presence of a large body of 'trap'. The prospectors then converged on the site and the rest is history; the Creighton mine is still in operation today, down below 7000', with no end to the ore at depth. .......so the answer is....for Sudbury, the railroad came first!

The Mookster

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply