Aiming to become the global leader in chip-scale photonic solutions by deploying Optical Interposer technology to enable the seamless integration of electronics and photonics for a broad range of vertical market applications

Free
Message: Re: re: 44-101 vs 45-106
20
Aug 01, 2015 08:44AM
2
Aug 01, 2015 08:47AM
9
Aug 01, 2015 09:12AM
4
Aug 01, 2015 09:42AM
21
Aug 01, 2015 10:03AM
3
Aug 01, 2015 10:11AM
1
Aug 01, 2015 10:23AM
14
Aug 01, 2015 10:28AM
3
Aug 01, 2015 10:29AM
8
Aug 01, 2015 10:40AM
2
Aug 01, 2015 10:49AM
2
Aug 01, 2015 10:52AM
2
Aug 01, 2015 11:05AM
15
Aug 01, 2015 11:17AM
4
Aug 01, 2015 12:15PM
17
Aug 01, 2015 12:34PM
5
Aug 01, 2015 12:38PM
32
Aug 01, 2015 01:05PM
21
Aug 01, 2015 01:15PM
9
Aug 01, 2015 01:31PM
4
Aug 01, 2015 01:59PM
1
Aug 01, 2015 02:08PM
7
Aug 02, 2015 02:48PM
10
Aug 03, 2015 12:51PM
11
Aug 03, 2015 01:10PM
2
Aug 03, 2015 01:11PM
1
Aug 03, 2015 01:14PM
2
Aug 03, 2015 01:18PM

Rob, it appears to me, and let me caveat, I haven't had long to look at this, that, as you say, the 45-106 is used for private placements. You could not pursue a public offering under that instrument. The 44-101 is for non-private offerings. And, so, if a public offering is coming, it could be a firm underwriting or a best efforts. If it's a firm underwriting, the lead broker will negotiate a price with POET and buy the entire offering at that price, and then redistribute the shares on the open market, likely placing many with existing clients.

4
Aug 03, 2015 02:02PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply