Free
Message: Re: LG .... Regarding consultation with client @ settlement

Oct 15, 2008 07:38AM
6
Oct 16, 2008 09:24AM

Oct 16, 2008 09:28AM
7
Oct 16, 2008 10:02AM

Oct 16, 2008 10:11AM

Oct 16, 2008 10:16AM

Oct 16, 2008 10:18AM

Oct 16, 2008 10:25AM

Oct 16, 2008 10:38AM

Oct 16, 2008 10:42AM
1
Oct 16, 2008 10:45AM
1
Oct 16, 2008 10:52AM

Oct 16, 2008 10:55AM

Oct 16, 2008 10:58AM
3
Oct 16, 2008 11:01AM

Oct 16, 2008 11:04AM
2
Oct 16, 2008 12:41PM

Oct 16, 2008 02:17PM

Oct 16, 2008 02:38PM

Trillium, the words "communicate" "consult" are well and good. Both of them denote keeping EDig aware of what is transpiring. No where do either of those words say "permission from EDig"

I sat in RP's office on two separate occasions and talked at length about various aspects of the lawsuits and in ALL the conversations RP state unequivically "DM is in total control"

Perhaps I did not follow up in the proper manner and ask "Does EDig have to approve of the details DM has worked out with an infringer"? but the way the conversation went RP said EDig had input, guide lines, P. Nunnally involvement but is was made quite clear to me that DM made the deals.

If I am mistaken then I apologize to the board for misinformation. I am just reporting to you what I clearly heard him say.



Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply