I had some concerns to, until I found that:

1. There is no "prior art" to reference for EDIG's patents;

2. DM would not take the case on contingency unless there was a better than 75% chance of recouping 'substantial' damages (or amounts);

3. EDIG was the first to have a flash-recording product and medium;

4. a few of the biggest names (likely to be named in a suit) were not only aware of EDIG's technology, they also tried to use it without licensing since they thought they could get away with it and EDIG wouldn't last (or be able to match their legal teams due to lack of funds).

Guess they were wrong on number 4.

BTW, I too hold a small speculative position in P(Censored).