Re: Patent Re-certication LL/lake
posted on
Mar 02, 2009 09:37AM
LL,
I believe the claim that was made in the "no prior art" refers to the process in which EDIG 'manipulates' FLASH in order to acheive the result. I'm not too technical when it comes to this. Doni has posted quite a bit regarding this and I believe he has mentioned that EDIG's process has no prior art.
Doni, correct me if I'm wrong.