Free
Message: Re: Patent Re-certication LL/lake

Mar 02, 2009 07:41AM
5
Mar 02, 2009 07:50AM
4
Mar 02, 2009 08:04AM

Re: Patent Re-certication LL/lake

posted on Mar 02, 2009 09:37AM

LL,



I believe the claim that was made in the "no prior art" refers to the process in which EDIG 'manipulates' FLASH in order to acheive the result. I'm not too technical when it comes to this. Doni has posted quite a bit regarding this and I believe he has mentioned that EDIG's process has no prior art.



Doni, correct me if I'm wrong.

1
Mar 02, 2009 09:56AM
3
Mar 02, 2009 10:20AM
7
Mar 02, 2009 10:24AM
2
Mar 02, 2009 01:55PM
1
Mar 02, 2009 02:04PM
4
Mar 02, 2009 02:10PM
1
Mar 02, 2009 02:10PM
2
Mar 02, 2009 02:23PM
1
Mar 02, 2009 02:27PM
1
Mar 02, 2009 02:34PM
1
Mar 02, 2009 02:35PM
1
Mar 02, 2009 02:53PM
1
Mar 02, 2009 03:00PM
1
Mar 02, 2009 03:06PM
1
Mar 02, 2009 03:10PM
5
Mar 03, 2009 02:28AM
4
Mar 03, 2009 03:08AM
2
Mar 03, 2009 08:09AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply