"Really for the benefit of the firm we should all be more demanding and the mangement should be more forthcoming."

I can understand your thoughts....I ponder similar, though not centered around a business model, I'd like to understand a strategy surrounding the tech.....without the conjecture.

The only thing I can put any solace in at this point is the Polis association. What questions are they asking? Are they anemic at this point? Do they care about their investment?

They now have eyes within the company, they must be looking for answers as we are. Are they happy with what additional insight they might have gained? Do they understand the secrecy?

It looks as if they're there to stay....I'm just a little flaky over the Samsung situation, where from my prospective, it's looking like 50% less in IP value. Why is that? Why have we given up our rights, where it was expressed in filings that they where not giving up their rights to future actions against Samsung? I read the comments stated, yet they signed off in the end to language that seems unjustified to the comments.

That is what I'm confused about. Had I not read "we are not waiving our rights of future actions against Samsung" in response to the court, I would not have a problem.

WE are not waiving, but yes we will agree to this language...

"1. All claims by e.Digital Corporation of infringement relating to U.S. Patent Nos. 5,787,445 (“the ‘445 patent”) and 5,839,108 (“the ‘108 patent”) that have been or could have been brought in this lawsuit against Samsung Electronics America, Inc., or related Samsung entities that could have been named in this lawsuit, are hereby dismissed with prejudice."

?????

doni