Free
Message: Re: Gil,,,Michael...
9
Oct 15, 2009 10:15PM
6
Oct 15, 2009 10:31PM
6
Oct 15, 2009 10:43PM

Oct 16, 2009 01:19AM
4
Oct 16, 2009 02:54AM
3
Oct 16, 2009 01:01PM
12
Oct 16, 2009 06:17PM
7
Oct 16, 2009 07:37PM

Oct 16, 2009 08:14PM
1
Oct 16, 2009 08:27PM
1
Oct 16, 2009 11:29PM
3
Oct 16, 2009 11:50PM
12
Oct 16, 2009 11:51PM
8
Oct 17, 2009 12:19AM
10
Oct 17, 2009 10:08AM
2
Oct 17, 2009 10:39AM

Oct 17, 2009 10:43AM
4
Oct 17, 2009 12:28PM
1
Oct 17, 2009 01:23PM
1
Oct 17, 2009 01:40PM
2
Oct 17, 2009 04:59PM
1
Oct 17, 2009 06:28PM
2
Oct 17, 2009 06:36PM
6
Oct 17, 2009 06:57PM

Oct 17, 2009 07:05PM

Oct 17, 2009 07:05PM
3
Oct 17, 2009 09:04PM

Oct 17, 2009 10:04PM
1
Oct 17, 2009 10:52PM
Icon president Gil
11
Oct 18, 2009 12:15AM
5
Oct 18, 2009 12:49AM

Re: Gil,,,Michael...

in response to by
posted on Oct 18, 2009 12:56AM

You are right...

That is why I refered to your Box net...

I was merely addressing the Value they have given to EDIG and that a 50% fee in litigated case with appellate work is quite the Norm in such complex cases, and did say that was my reclolection and people should read the source...

But, the negotiated Fee agreement is quite reasonable and will be held all the way to Supreme Court considerity the complextity of the case, the expertese brought to the table by DM, the result acheived, and the RISK/REWARD factors that are the standards used by the Courts in assessing if a fee agreement between the attorneys and the cllients was way out of line and excessive...

KEEP YOUR EYES PEELED STARTING MONDAY...Lol...

Gil...

1
Oct 18, 2009 01:32AM
1
Oct 18, 2009 11:39AM
2
Oct 18, 2009 02:39PM
1
Oct 18, 2009 02:54PM
7
Oct 21, 2009 08:45AM
4
Oct 21, 2009 11:22AM
10
Oct 21, 2009 11:36AM
7
Oct 21, 2009 11:59AM
6
Oct 21, 2009 12:19PM
4
Oct 21, 2009 12:35PM
1
Oct 21, 2009 12:57PM
Icon president B-L
1
Oct 21, 2009 01:00PM
3
Oct 21, 2009 01:14PM

Oct 21, 2009 01:21PM
2
Oct 21, 2009 01:32PM
4
Oct 21, 2009 01:51PM
15
Oct 21, 2009 02:08PM
3
Oct 21, 2009 02:12PM
3
Oct 21, 2009 02:14PM
1
Oct 21, 2009 02:14PM

Oct 21, 2009 02:29PM

Oct 21, 2009 02:35PM

Oct 21, 2009 02:38PM
1
Oct 21, 2009 02:46PM
3
Oct 21, 2009 02:58PM
2
Oct 21, 2009 02:59PM
8
Oct 22, 2009 12:06AM

Oct 22, 2009 01:55AM
5
Oct 22, 2009 10:00AM
1
Oct 22, 2009 10:06AM
1
Oct 22, 2009 11:00AM
2
Oct 22, 2009 11:15AM
1
Oct 22, 2009 11:25AM
6
Oct 22, 2009 12:13PM

Oct 22, 2009 12:19PM
1
Oct 22, 2009 12:25PM
5
Oct 22, 2009 12:48PM
4
Oct 22, 2009 12:53PM
2
Oct 22, 2009 01:19PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply