“the only memory of the received processed sound electrical signals, without another memory system such as RAM”
Do you all understand why the defendants want that added phrase?
Do you all understand where the defendants are determining their argument for the change?
Where it's up to a judge to allow or ignor it...
If you read 296, the plaintiffs council explains why they want it. IMO, if they get that added phrase....they might just as well change the heading of the patent.
It's not what the patent is about, it's up to a judge "as a matter of law" to tell us if it is or not.
This is what the hearing is about, and issues we need resolved.
doni
