"For example much has been said here on what the parties meant in their briefs filed with the Court. There is no substantive issue that defendats have raised. The main point seems to have been to "Exclude" any testimony from the "Inventors"...

Along with his exhibits....as well as entering supposed comments of his during the prosecution, in order to change the meaning of "sole memory" as published in the patent.

As to these issues, I have no idea if they are "substantive". I do know what they are trying to do as explained by the plaintiffs council as well along with my own consideration....where the issues are to be determined by the court.

Can you guarantee the defendants proposed phrase “the only memory of the received processed sound electrical signals, without another memory system such as RAM” will not be identified by the court ?

Much leans on that phrase....and it is a much discussed detail of the briefs filed.

doni