The right to introduce "Evidence" is fundemental to our legal system. It is not the question how hard defendants are fighting it; it is whether they have made a case that plaintiff's fundental right to present his "evidence" should be curtailed by the Court...

I have seen nothing so far that justifies the judge to grant defendant's request to exclude Woody's testimoney, and expose herself to a claim by DM that she violated the "DUE PROCESS RIGHTS" of EDIG...

We will see what she RULES in the morning...

Gil...