Free
Message: Re: May of 2006 "774"
8
Apr 05, 2011 11:36PM
1
Apr 05, 2011 11:49PM
9
Apr 06, 2011 12:44AM

That's the way I remembered it. Management and the people they hired/consulted with were responsible for verifying that the portfolio looked promising and identifying in particular the 774 prior to DM even being signed. And is more than likely "the reason DM signed".

Sounds like this is an instance where management deserves credit, not criticism.

Coyote

8
Apr 06, 2011 02:06AM
12
Apr 06, 2011 08:32AM
5
Apr 06, 2011 10:21AM
3
Apr 06, 2011 10:25AM
5
Apr 06, 2011 12:13PM
18
Apr 06, 2011 04:25PM
4
Apr 06, 2011 05:11PM
16
Apr 06, 2011 08:05PM
5
Apr 06, 2011 10:10PM
14
Apr 06, 2011 10:40PM
5
Apr 07, 2011 01:38AM
11
Apr 07, 2011 05:22AM
9
Apr 07, 2011 08:34AM
7
Apr 07, 2011 09:27AM
7
Apr 07, 2011 09:43AM
2
Apr 07, 2011 10:06AM
7
Apr 07, 2011 10:20AM
6
Apr 07, 2011 11:40AM
3
Apr 07, 2011 12:07PM
2
Apr 07, 2011 01:00PM
3
Apr 07, 2011 01:23PM
9
Apr 07, 2011 01:31PM
3
Apr 07, 2011 02:06PM
4
Apr 07, 2011 02:16PM
2
Apr 07, 2011 03:11PM
13
Apr 07, 2011 03:32PM
1
Apr 07, 2011 04:30PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply