Free
Message: Re: May of 2006 "774"Coyote
8
Apr 05, 2011 11:36PM
1
Apr 05, 2011 11:49PM
9
Apr 06, 2011 12:44AM
4
Apr 06, 2011 12:59AM
8
Apr 06, 2011 02:06AM
12
Apr 06, 2011 08:32AM
5
Apr 06, 2011 10:21AM
3
Apr 06, 2011 10:25AM
5
Apr 06, 2011 12:13PM
18
Apr 06, 2011 04:25PM
4
Apr 06, 2011 05:11PM
16
Apr 06, 2011 08:05PM
5
Apr 06, 2011 10:10PM
14
Apr 06, 2011 10:40PM
5
Apr 07, 2011 01:38AM
11
Apr 07, 2011 05:22AM

""Hey Doni, care to give us your opnion on this please

"Bottom line..they didn't know what they had until the evaluations. Whether that is good or bad I leave to you and others.""

"saw that this was possibly our best bet for $$$$ since attempting to license the MicroOS for all those years did not pay off."

$$$$....?

Do you consider there to be an initial process to the patent linage/inventiveness that must be recognized first?

If not, you might re-consider.

The sophistication of MicroOS compared to 774 is not an issue yet....where in the scheme of things....the ancestry is separate.

With that, management know exactly what they have....and how the patents are justified.

doni

7
Apr 07, 2011 09:27AM
7
Apr 07, 2011 09:43AM
2
Apr 07, 2011 10:06AM
7
Apr 07, 2011 10:20AM
6
Apr 07, 2011 11:40AM
3
Apr 07, 2011 12:07PM
2
Apr 07, 2011 01:00PM
3
Apr 07, 2011 01:23PM
9
Apr 07, 2011 01:31PM
3
Apr 07, 2011 02:06PM
4
Apr 07, 2011 02:16PM
2
Apr 07, 2011 03:11PM
13
Apr 07, 2011 03:32PM
1
Apr 07, 2011 04:30PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply