Free
Message: Re: 8K Out...Narrowing the scope
14
Jun 29, 2011 05:40PM
1
Jun 29, 2011 05:49PM
10
Jun 29, 2011 06:37PM
6
Jun 29, 2011 07:43PM

for sure....she considered B....lets see A....seeing that she noted for B that she was not being totaly slanted towards the defendants language. However, she is.

A. “flash memory” (Claims 1, 2 and 19 of the ‘774 Patent and Claim 5 of the ‘737 Patent)

e.Digital’s Proposed Construction: "block erasable non-volatile memory"

Defendants’ Proposed Construction: "block erasable non-volatile memory that is the main memory of the system "

................

Lets see her consideration of block erasable trapped electron memory(flash) as being Main memory in the context of the defendants.....used for processing circumstances as she considers for B.

doni

15
Jun 29, 2011 10:50PM
11
Jun 29, 2011 11:22PM
7
Jun 30, 2011 12:14AM
7
Jun 30, 2011 12:58AM
23
Jul 02, 2011 11:54PM
10
Jul 03, 2011 11:34AM
11
Jul 03, 2011 01:23PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply