Free
Message: Re: USPTO issued a Reexamination Certificate for Certificate for the ’774 patent
16
Jul 08, 2013 01:48PM
7
Jul 08, 2013 02:59PM

" infringers can't be allowed to claim that they are not liable for past damages. "

90/011,379

90/011,379 filed on 12-08-2010(5742737 : METHOD FOR RECORDING VOICE MESSAGES ON FLASH MEMORY IN A HAND HELD RECORDER) which is Pending claims the benefit of 08/229,731

This application is Re-examination of 08/810,210 03-03-1997 Patented 5,742,737
is a continuation of 08/339,976 11-15-1994 Abandoned -
is a Continuation-in-part of 08/229,570 04-19-1994 Abandoned -
is a Continuation-in-part of 08/229,731 04-19-1994 Patented 5,491,774
Child Continuity Data

--------------------------------------------------------------------

774 just need be held up to re-exam status with regard to the cases.

737 is the ticket as it did not change significantly, however, it is connected to 774 directly as a continuation.

There's no problem of "not liable for past damages. " with regard to 737 as long as 774 stands.

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply