Yes, I logged onto my pacer account and got the full date details,.... "as of 11/25/13" was your reference and not the docket.
| 10/23/2013 |
10 |
Entry of appearance for Jose L. Patino as principal counsel for Appellees Futurewei Technologies, Inc. and Huawei Device USA, Inc.. Service: 10/23/2013 by email. [112345]
=====
|
| 10/23/2013 |
11 |
Entry of appearance for Nicola A. Pisano as of counsel for Appellees Futurewei Technologies, Inc. and Huawei Device USA, Inc.. Service: 10/23/2013 by email. [112413]
=====
|
| 11/05/2013 |
12 |
Entry of appearance for Christopher C. Bolten as of counsel for Appellees Futurewei Technologies, Inc. and Huawei Device USA, Inc.. Service: 11/05/2013 by email. [114993] |
====================================
Thanks, now the question is, seeing that the lead council for Huawei had previously made notice of representation....and there is the question of the appeal still needing approval by the court, why did Bolten sign on? Why not wait to see if the appeal is granted?
Set to go?
doni
