COMMON SENSE BORN FROM FRUSTRATION AND I DO AGREE WITH ALL, HOWEVER I STILL FEEL THERE IS MUCH, AND I MEAN MUCH, TO BE GAINED FROM FLASH PATENT INFRINGEMENT. EVEN THOUGH THOSE PATENTS ARE EXPIRING AND THE TECH MAY HAVE PASSED US BY WITH WHAT THOSE PATENTS REPRESENTED "THE STATE OF THE ART" IN THAT FIELD AND HAS BEEN/IS STILL BEING USED BY THE ENTIRE WORLD OF FLASH PATENT USERS.

IT HAS BEEN STATED ON THE BOARD MANY TIMES AND I HAVE DONE MY DUE DILIGENCE ON THE "6 YEAR LOOK BACK" THAT INFRINGEMENT LAWSUITS CAN STILL BE BROUGHT/WON/AND COLLECTED ON FOR THAT PERIOD UPON THE EXPIRATION OF THE PATENT.

IF EDIG LETS THIS DROP AND CONCENTRATES SOLELY ON NEWER PATENTS, NUNCHI...ETAL I DO BELIEVE WE WILL BE IN ANOTHER LONG PERIOD OF.....ZERO...ZERO.....UNTIL WE REACH THE POINT WITH THEM WE ARE NOW WITH ON FLASH PATENTS.

WE ARE ALL SO JADED ON FLASH BECAUSE THAT'S ALL WE HAVE KNOWN AND HEARD ABOOUT FOR YEARS IT ALSMOST AS IF IT HAS BECOME THE "CRAZY UNCLE" IN THE ATTIC BUT IT IS STILL "HUGE"...EVERYTHING (RELATED) STILL RUNS WITH SOME FORM OF FLASH IN IT AND HOPEFULLY EDIG IS SOMEWHERE IN THERE.

THAT IS MONEY, THAT IS LICENSE (MAYBE) THAT IS A PPS WE CAN ACTUALLY SEE WITH OUR EYES NOT A MICROSCOPE.....HANDAL STILL HAS MANY IRONS IN THAT FIRE WITH SOME VERY BIG NAMES. IF PREVAILS EDIG IS "BIG TIME"