Free
Message: Re: EDIG v.Dropcam-Case managemet &order- Trial date Oct,10/2016 (2)
Icon president CES
1
Jan 05, 2016 08:57AM
2
Jan 05, 2016 08:59AM
1
Jan 05, 2016 09:02AM
2
Jan 05, 2016 09:05AM

Jan 05, 2016 09:08AM
1
Jan 05, 2016 11:39AM

Jan 05, 2016 12:18PM

Jan 05, 2016 02:08PM
5
Jan 05, 2016 02:17PM
4
Jan 05, 2016 02:18PM
1
Jan 05, 2016 03:49PM
1
Jan 05, 2016 04:00PM
4
Jan 05, 2016 04:17PM
4
Jan 05, 2016 04:43PM

"Apart from any stay, if the patent survives the IPR, there is a significant chance the IPR estoppel provision could preclude a litigant from challenging validity at trial based on prior art that could have been raised in the IPR. If the litigation is stayed, this outcome is nearly certain. Also, the AIA gives a patent owner the right to stay litigation once an IPR is instituted, unless the district court judge determines a stay would not be in the best interests of justice".

Till now there is no indication by judge re stay of the case. JMO

1
Jan 05, 2016 07:23PM
3
Jan 06, 2016 08:32AM
1
Jan 07, 2016 01:46AM
1
Jan 07, 2016 10:24AM
1
Jan 18, 2016 05:52PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply