Re: Pacer - Withdrawn of one of Arcsoft Attorney !
in response to
by
posted on
Jul 19, 2016 04:14PM
IMHO It means "ArcSolft" fumbled again! When they negotiated an "Early Settlement" in the Federal Southern District suddenly the "Dropcam" case in the Northern District became of interest. Dropcam requested a IPR of the "Patents" and IMHO they did not want a "Settelment" to occur. Well now we know the opposite occured "Dropcam" Setteled! ArcSolft IMHO should be paying at a "Premium" for taking the "Gamble". Although, they took the gamble did "Google" accept the risk? We will never know that question someone just pay the "Bill" in eDigital Coins. LoL