Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: Indirect Holding is the key
10
Mar 22, 2012 11:27PM
7
Mar 22, 2012 11:37PM
10
Mar 23, 2012 12:45AM
3
Mar 23, 2012 02:57AM
1
Mar 23, 2012 08:09AM
7
Mar 23, 2012 08:48AM
4
Mar 23, 2012 10:12AM
2
Mar 23, 2012 10:23AM
2
Mar 23, 2012 10:40AM
3
MES
Mar 23, 2012 11:03AM
3
Mar 23, 2012 11:50AM

Mar 23, 2012 12:07PM
3
Mar 23, 2012 12:49PM
7
Mar 23, 2012 01:09PM
2
Mar 23, 2012 01:12PM

I would not want to be on the board at TT. This is a major embarr(ass)ment. It will have an industry wide impact. Elmer said to others that changing companies would cause huge delays and it was better to fix the problem. Teck insisted we use them. Was the old company that bad? Was there another problem not mentioned? Hmmmm. So we went from one turkey to another. At least we can work on the inside with this one. This reminds me of the 80's when results were delayed months and report writers had all kinds of problems keeping up with the demand for studies. It was a bit different back then. That's when there was a lot of critisism about the value of these studies. Justly so. Still, I see something else must be afoot. Why no options struck? Land or studies? Negotiations for contractual purposes or extensions? This would impact the spirit of the contract. I can see both companies having a bit of grief over this. Time is short.

I think we'll find out soon what the black out is about but we won't know the full details of what went on in the back room. Probably never will. I hope they are talking contracts for the spinco. This fits with my main theory that we have a sliding scale deal. Why wouldn't Teck offer the same deal on the North and just take the proven? Let us do what we do best.

1
Mar 23, 2012 02:54PM
4
Mar 23, 2012 03:21PM
7
Mar 23, 2012 04:44PM

Mar 23, 2012 04:51PM
8
Mar 23, 2012 04:53PM

Mar 23, 2012 04:59PM

Mar 23, 2012 07:31PM
3
Mar 23, 2012 08:06PM
2
Mar 23, 2012 09:21PM
12
Mar 23, 2012 09:49PM
5
MES
Mar 23, 2012 09:56PM
10
Mar 23, 2012 11:53PM
2
Mar 24, 2012 12:34AM
3
Mar 24, 2012 02:09PM

Mar 24, 2012 11:28PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply