Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: Drilling and Blackout:
12
Sep 14, 2012 05:11PM
1
Sep 14, 2012 05:25PM

Sep 14, 2012 05:27PM
8
Sep 14, 2012 06:22PM
8
Sep 14, 2012 06:52PM
3
Sep 14, 2012 07:02PM
3
Sep 14, 2012 07:08PM
13
Sep 14, 2012 07:30PM
2
Sep 14, 2012 07:53PM
7
Sep 14, 2012 08:17PM
4
Sep 14, 2012 08:32PM
1
Sep 14, 2012 09:17PM
7
Sep 14, 2012 09:41PM
2
Sep 14, 2012 09:49PM

At first blush I find the shift to Arizona to be disapointing. Maybe a deal is being hashed out as we speak. Or, maybe the SC district is getting too developed and pricy as it is in order to sell it quickly.

Why make the SC asset more prohibitively expensive. Say a buyer taking out the project is looking to spend between $1B to $5B to by the BC asset. That buyer then needs to build and finance the mine. Say that is only $3B to build. That's a $4 B to $8 Billion byte all at once which is a sobering thought for even the major miners.

If there is to be a CUU 2.0, we can be sure that the Arizona properties will be part of it. The Sombrero Butte project has some promising drill results in those breccia pipes. While the deal is worked out on Schaft and/or the entire BC assets, work on those properties that will be part of CUU 2.0 (if there is one).

6
Sep 14, 2012 10:19PM
11
Sep 14, 2012 10:23PM
5
Sep 14, 2012 10:43PM
2
Sep 14, 2012 10:44PM
13
Sep 14, 2012 10:51PM
2
Sep 14, 2012 10:55PM
5
Sep 14, 2012 10:56PM
1
Sep 14, 2012 10:58PM
3
Sep 14, 2012 10:59PM
2
Sep 14, 2012 11:10PM
5
Sep 14, 2012 11:17PM
4
Sep 14, 2012 11:24PM
3
Sep 14, 2012 11:27PM

Sep 14, 2012 11:29PM
3
Sep 14, 2012 11:34PM
2
Sep 14, 2012 11:40PM
3
Sep 14, 2012 11:59PM
1
Sep 15, 2012 12:22AM
1
Sep 15, 2012 08:29AM
1
Sep 15, 2012 09:54AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply