Re: My one concern....question for the board
in response to
by
posted on
Jul 29, 2013 12:33PM
CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)
"We have no assurance that this project will ever get built. That is by far the greatest risk with this invesment."
That would be true IF CUU management made a decission to take this to that stage (i.e., mine), but as far as I know they still want to sell. So the greatest risk in short term would be lack of interest for our 25% by another entity. If the metal market bounces this risk will surely decrease.
====================
CUU management made the decision to give up on all the anti-mothball clauses. We are completely and absolutely at Teck's mercy right now. If they want to shelve the project for a later date, they can (and for as long as they want) and there isn't a single thing we can do about it.
Think about what really could happen here. What is the whole project worth as it sits? 1-2 billion, maybe more? We allowed Teck to put us on a indeterminate lay-away plan for a measley 20 million down payment.
Sure we can sell our 25% to anyone, at any time, but Teck is in control and who is going to pay the money we are expecting for 25% of a shelved project? This is the elephant in the room it seems we want to ignore.
Yes, this may not all happen, and they may be planning to build a mine ASAP, but with all the previous 'Teck wants this delayed" speculation over the past years you have to wonder where we are headed and what was Elmer thinking?