Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: CUU 's sc true value?
1
Jan 13, 2014 11:45AM

Jan 13, 2014 11:54AM
2
Jan 13, 2014 12:13PM
8
Jan 13, 2014 12:50PM
2
Jan 13, 2014 01:06PM
13
Jan 13, 2014 02:43PM
1
Jan 13, 2014 03:11PM
13
Jan 13, 2014 03:26PM
3
Jan 13, 2014 04:29PM
12
Jan 13, 2014 05:11PM
16
Jan 13, 2014 05:19PM
3
Jan 13, 2014 05:40PM
7
Jan 13, 2014 05:44PM
9
Jan 13, 2014 08:06PM
12
Jan 14, 2014 03:22AM
4
Jan 14, 2014 09:26AM
1
Jan 14, 2014 09:50AM
7
Jan 14, 2014 09:58AM
1
Jan 14, 2014 10:34AM
9
Jan 14, 2014 11:22AM
2
Jan 14, 2014 11:32AM
14
Jan 14, 2014 11:47AM
1
Jan 14, 2014 11:53AM
9
Jan 14, 2014 12:01PM
4
Jan 14, 2014 12:15PM

You were incorrect in stating that a Back-in Option guaranteed a mine. After Back-in, Teck stilll reserved the production decision.

=====================

Golfyeti, while you are technically correct, I don't think it is realistic to think that after 4x expenditures they could possibly walk. I think the Salazar offered realistic anti-mothball protection and certainty regarding us becoming a mine (even though technically they could back out, it would be a virtual certainty that they wouldn't).

That is a LOT of money to spend then walk, and if in fact they ever did we would have a much more valuable property with the new exploration, development and Liard shares.

How many here have stated that even Teck's 20 million back in plus 2013 drilling makes a strong argument that Teck will not shelve the project? I think to suggest Teck walking after a Salazar back in is a stretch.

Many blame our current share price on market conditions only and everything has went very well with this project, and although I do agree market conditions are a huge part of it - our lack of certainty is huge as well. If Teck gave us a positive production decision today I would bet we would jump to 80 cents minimum - probably even higher.

If this response isn't up to your required standards, I guess you can delete it or ban me? Unfortunately, a select few can control board sentiment.

If I don't share your point of view (which must be correct, right?) I don't deserve to share this board with you...

8
Jan 14, 2014 01:52PM
17
Jan 14, 2014 02:09PM
2
Jan 14, 2014 02:49PM
3
Jan 14, 2014 03:05PM
3
Jan 14, 2014 03:25PM
4
Jan 14, 2014 03:26PM
4
Jan 14, 2014 03:29PM
1
Jan 14, 2014 03:31PM
1
Jan 14, 2014 03:43PM
3
Jan 14, 2014 03:51PM
1
Jan 14, 2014 03:57PM
3
Jan 14, 2014 04:22PM
16
Jan 14, 2014 04:51PM
2
Jan 14, 2014 04:55PM
3
Jan 14, 2014 06:11PM
3
Jan 14, 2014 09:47PM
3
Jan 14, 2014 10:14PM
5
Jan 14, 2014 10:40PM
7
Jan 14, 2014 11:36PM
4
Jan 14, 2014 11:55PM
7
Jan 15, 2014 12:23AM
3
Jan 15, 2014 11:58AM
2
Jan 15, 2014 12:04PM
2
Jan 15, 2014 12:04PM
2
Jan 15, 2014 12:20PM
4
Jan 15, 2014 12:29PM
10
Jan 15, 2014 12:41PM
2
Jan 15, 2014 12:48PM
7
Jan 15, 2014 01:22PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply