Sorry, advanced apology that I just cannot waste any time educating you. I understand that some things are just not possible, one needs a reasonable substrate for a potential reaction.

You, like MOMG, are over-opinionated (you both obviously have an exception regard for your own unsubstantiated opinions, although I don't see on what basis, despite your repeating the same erroneous information ad nauseum), grossly undereducated, and poorly informed based upon what must only be some odd sort of "common sense," which sadly does not work when it comes to the law.

If I were you, I would sue my law school for their utter failure to teach simple concepts; you clearly have a case for that, as you could not ever have passed a bar exam with your apparent complete non-comprehension of even the most basic differences between corporations, fiduciary, and federal securities law.

Having a few failed delisted stocks and reading some websites is not really considered expertise by most practitioners.

Your earlier reply to me, sadly, only reinforced my opinion as to your complete lack of knowledge or experience in substantive legal issues, as you were yet again completely incorrect.

However, not being a harsh judge of character, if you were valedictorian at a better law school than me, or if you have more time at an international firm where you actually litigated and arbitrated these issues more than I did, I apologize in advance and bow to your superior wisdom.

But try not to expect any of your demanded guarantees of success from Crystallex -- they have excellent legal counsel and would never do anything that stupid. /facepalm

I am of course (and quite obviously) a bit impatient, not suffering fools well, but do appreciate any factual information on Crystallex, or even an opinion that is at least cogent and legally rational, with some minimal basis of understanding.

Happy Holidays.