Welcome to the Crystallex HUB on AGORACOM

Crystallex International Corporation is a Canadian-based gold company with a successful record of developing and operating gold mines in Venezuela and elsewhere in South America

Free
Message: Re: Revoked Shares??? JJ
10
Dec 02, 2013 03:32PM
3
Dec 02, 2013 05:09PM
2
Dec 02, 2013 05:16PM
11
Dec 02, 2013 05:57PM

Dec 02, 2013 06:48PM
17
Dec 03, 2013 11:46AM
5
Dec 03, 2013 11:52AM
9
Dec 03, 2013 12:00PM
2
Dec 03, 2013 12:09PM
3
Dec 03, 2013 12:28PM
15
Dec 04, 2013 01:44AM
6
Dec 04, 2013 02:56PM
6
Dec 04, 2013 03:05PM
6
Dec 04, 2013 05:43PM
6
Dec 04, 2013 06:40PM
5
Dec 04, 2013 06:46PM
4
Dec 04, 2013 06:57PM
5
Dec 04, 2013 07:49PM

Request was, "Can you show a link to a company that reregistered with the SEC and the shareholders found that their shares were cancelled?" Thanks for the benefit of the doubt, but each and every CCAA/Chapter 11 case is different, so finding two exactly alike is highly unlikely.

Kodak matches the request and the outcome is more typical than not. Whatever plan there is pretty much doesn't matter with the SEC, FINRA and DTCC currently taking a tough enforcement stance on revoked shares, giving investors a tough lesson to learn because Kodak IR gave the song and dance (but no PR's, sound familiar?) of, "no problems for revoked holders," up until the gavel hit.

I cannot find any company where revoked shares have been recently reinstated and traded. Apparently none out there. I do know of a mining company, that applied to get their revoked shares reinstated and actually slipped by the SEC and was set to trade, but hit the FINRA/DTCC roadblock.

Previous arb give-aways to Tenor (curiously, in writing) set dangerous precidence for Common's future. Reason I suggest Crystallex outright disclose a Common's disbursement is because previous Crystallex claims of, "mistake," about Delisting-Suspension-Revoke, still rings loud for each. This is business, and everyone knows the consequences if it is not in writing, right? Since all other benefactors are outright covered in writing, why not make it in writing to cover Commons?

1
Dec 04, 2013 09:59PM
2
Dec 04, 2013 10:13PM
1
Dec 04, 2013 10:23PM
4
Dec 04, 2013 11:10PM
1
Dec 05, 2013 01:31AM
1
Dec 05, 2013 01:46AM
1
Dec 05, 2013 01:55AM
1
Dec 05, 2013 01:43PM
6
Dec 05, 2013 03:48PM
5
Dec 05, 2013 03:51PM
2
Dec 05, 2013 04:00PM
7
Dec 05, 2013 04:25PM
1
Dec 05, 2013 04:42PM

Dec 05, 2013 04:42PM
3
Dec 05, 2013 06:52PM
7
Dec 05, 2013 07:37PM
2
Dec 05, 2013 07:40PM
3
Dec 05, 2013 07:46PM
12
Dec 05, 2013 08:52PM
4
Dec 05, 2013 09:36PM
3
Dec 05, 2013 09:58PM
6
Dec 05, 2013 10:03PM
12
Dec 06, 2013 02:54AM
10
Dec 06, 2013 09:19AM
3
Dec 06, 2013 10:03AM
3
Dec 06, 2013 12:31PM
4
Dec 06, 2013 12:42PM
7
Dec 06, 2013 01:44PM
2
Dec 06, 2013 05:34PM
15
Dec 06, 2013 06:32PM
2
Dec 06, 2013 09:24PM
6
Dec 07, 2013 10:00AM
1
ctw
Dec 07, 2013 10:49AM
3
Dec 07, 2013 04:02PM
4
Dec 07, 2013 04:12PM

Dec 07, 2013 04:22PM
5
Dec 07, 2013 04:34PM
12
Dec 07, 2013 04:59PM
2
Dec 07, 2013 11:14PM
4
Dec 08, 2013 03:49PM
3
Dec 08, 2013 04:05PM
2
Dec 08, 2013 06:42PM
4
Dec 08, 2013 06:53PM
2
Dec 09, 2013 02:43PM
2
Dec 10, 2013 03:06PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply