We all know how Hawk (Ken) likes to protect himself in answering our questions by putting a double meaning in his replies. I do believe that he is answering yes to on going payments but then again that might not be what he meant by answering yes.....

I really believe that Patriot would be better served to severe ties with Hawk and hire an inside investor relations officier. I am sure that we are spending enough with Hawk to go a long way to pay for an employee who would really be speaking for the company. Also does anyone know if Hawk is under retainer with TPL or one or all of it's affiliates? If so I wonder if we are not helping to subsidize that cost?

God Bless marc