But how will RG explain/justify the 15 cents at the SHM?

It's much too simple and IMHO in no way correct to blame it on the markets. I'm convinced the main reason is the missing validation by the USPTO - but why does the company refuse to admit the influence of the USPTO for the shareprice?

It's still a fact, that since his appearance the shareprice took the hardest dive down (compared with the former CEOs) from $ 0.39 to 0.155 as of today = 60% less worth of the company (though it should be more worth with all the things he accomplished).

And I still think he knew, how the shareprice would develop, remembering his words in his first shareholder letter - "I know that change is both inevitable, and disconcerting," - and his purchases @ 0.40, 0.38 etc.

I wish I knew their plan, I would be more relaxed...glta