<since when do they have to do something wrong to get rid of them?>

My response is - they don't. Not sure what that has to do with this thread however.

<Whether they've done something wrong or not,>

So, what you are saying is that the SEC should waste their time and money to investigate something that is NOT "wrong doing" ???

In case the thread has gotten lost, a poster is claiming possible "wrong doing." That goes beyond bashing the BOD for bad business decisions. That hints at illegal activity of some kind. I'm just trying to find out if the "wrong doing" accusation is a just a loose cannon, or whether there is something actually of substance. It would appear to be the Former, IMHO.

I understand there are posts in between that makes the thread difficult to follow and you may not have read all of the thread in the fist place. So don't take this response the wrong way.

Opty