Did Swartz receive inside information before shareholders that gave him an advantage when selling off his shares? How does his share sell records compare to news events? Why were dividends issued when the company had just pulled out of debt when any good company would have saved the money to act on the umbrella plan?

Kindly explain how it would be possible to negotiate redemption of the warrants and convertibles without the knowledge of S&L, notwithstanding the price resets?

Please also remember that on every piece of good news many were complaing of S&L selling into it. The volume on perceived bad news doesn't appear to indicate any "insider selling" prior to the release either.

Why would S&L risk possible insider trading when they could make millions by strictly adhering to SEC guidelines?

Why would a "good company" wait to remove the warrants and convertibles, rather than remove them at the earliest possible opportunity?

.

.

Be well