Re: to ease2002
in response to
by
posted on
Mar 23, 2010 09:24AM
I thought you were here long enough to know the story.
What is hurting the share price is the pps history, which was impacted negatively by Swartz selling into every bit of good news. Don't you think that potential investors look at the share price history and scratch their heads wondering what the heck that is all about? We know, and that is why we are still here. But the ability for any good news to move the share price is gone until, as you say, the money is shown to us. That still leaves some questions, but any new investor is likely to keep on the sidelines until sustainability of a rising pps is confirmed.
"Patents on Water..." Shall I go on?
Anyone who is holding shares and does not believe that the MMP is that strong.... like patents on water, ought to bail and cut their losses. Really. What logic would one have for sticking around if you did not think the MMP is strong enough to succeed at the USPTO, succeed in any litigation and succeed in the licensing effort? Consider what the share price would be if any of the aforementioned was proven not to be possible. Fourteen cents would be a gift.
You come across as being skeptical as to the ability of the MMP to come through in all the above. Is that the case?
All IMHO, Opty