<On April 20, 2010 the Management Committee of PDS passed resolutions specifying that (i) any and all future licenses of the MMP Patent Portfolio must be approved in writing by a majority of the members of the Management Committee before they are agreed to or signed by TPL and (ii) effective immediately, TPL must not market patent portfolios in which PDS does not have an interest with the MMP Patent Portfolio. >

This is very revealing. Not so much the double dealing, we all knew it was happening, but perhaps insufficient proof? But TPL was selling licenses w/o any PDS input? I guess that was a necessary part of the double dealing effort, but surprising to me, none-the-less.

Opty