HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Drill Result Bottle Neck - rc/OJ - SUM
2
Dec 01, 2007 12:14PM
6
Dec 01, 2007 12:26PM
8
Dec 01, 2007 05:07PM
1
rc
Dec 02, 2007 01:08AM
17
Dec 02, 2007 01:39AM
35
Dec 02, 2007 05:42AM
8
PM
Dec 02, 2007 06:05AM
2
HSS
Dec 02, 2007 06:13AM
3
Dec 02, 2007 06:20AM
12
Dec 02, 2007 06:29AM
3
PM
Dec 02, 2007 06:39AM
4
Dec 02, 2007 07:08AM
4
Dec 02, 2007 07:23AM
4
Dec 02, 2007 07:49AM
5
Dec 02, 2007 08:03AM
3
Dec 02, 2007 08:14AM
1
Dec 02, 2007 08:39AM
2
HSS
Dec 02, 2007 08:39AM
1
Dec 02, 2007 09:20AM
2
HSS
Dec 02, 2007 10:02AM
2
HSS
Dec 02, 2007 10:06AM
1
HSS
Dec 02, 2007 10:11AM
Expanding existing facilities is the easiest means of increasing capacity in most cases. Many of the labs in other countries are affiliated with some here in Canada and for them Quality control is not a problem. As someone else mentioned a week or so ago, the short term difficulty is in the recruiting and training of new staff to get them certified to standards. These people are soft assets and with sufficient time lead shis can be addressed as well. Some Questions; a) Does anyone out there have good insight into exactly what the situation with respect to Assay Lab Technical Certification is? b) How quickly can Labs acquire and train Technical Staff to Industry Standards? c) Are Labs currently attempting to meat increasing demand for Assay work? i) By training new Technical Staff? ii) By expansion of existing Facilities? iii) By construction of new Facilities? Old Joe
1
Dec 02, 2007 12:13PM
3
Dec 02, 2007 01:57PM
3
Dec 02, 2007 02:52PM
4
Dec 02, 2007 04:18PM
1
Dec 02, 2007 11:44PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply