Edgy,

I wrote:

"The offer from NOT would be superior as FWR shareholders would still benefit from FWR's assets albeit within NOT."

You wrote:

"I read from above that you consider FWR shareholders would benefit less within NOT/FWR."

I don't believe my post implies any such thing and in fact my belief is the exact opposite of what you have stated. I have reread my post and am unable to explain how you came up with your interpretation of what I wrote.

Thanks